Free Essays on Workplace Privacy

The question of workplace privacy is a tricky one; in order to come up with a workable solution, one must balance the separate, and often conflicting, needs and expectations of employers and employees. In this essay, three types of workplace privacy issues will be discussed: e-mail and other office communications, employee drug testing, and the use of background checks. E-mail has rapidly become a staple of the modern office. Currently, two-thirds of employees in medium and large companies in the United States now have Internet access, compared with fifteen percent only two years ago. The availability of e-mail allows for messages to be widely and rapidly distributed, improving efficiency and reducing cost. In addition to being one of the components of the new workplace, e-mail is also the center of a hot privacy debate. Part of this is because, unlike regular mail, which is difficult to monitor, e-mail can be scanned with ease, allowing employers to engage in monitoring at an unprecedented rate, and raising the specter of a workplace free of privacy. As this relatively new technology gains ever increasing prevalence, certain questions arise, mainly, "How do we balance employee expectations of/right to privacy, with the rights of employers to observe employees to ensure quality, prevent leaks of proprietary information, and limit exposure to litigat ion?" Employers have a strong interest in monitoring the communications of their employees. Employees engaging in illegal acts, distributing proprietary information or sending sexually explicit or harassing e-mails are a serious threat and liability to the employer. However, employees should be given some measure of privacy. Privacy, along with being a human right, facilitates the free creation and distribution of ideas. If there were no private space within a company, it would most certainly have a chilling effect on the possibilities for free speech and creative thought. Employee mo... Free Essays on Workplace Privacy Free Essays on Workplace Privacy The question of workplace privacy is a tricky one; in order to come up with a workable solution, one must balance the separate, and often conflicting, needs and expectations of employers and employees. In this essay, three types of workplace privacy issues will be discussed: e-mail and other office communications, employee drug testing, and the use of background checks. E-mail has rapidly become a staple of the modern office. Currently, two-thirds of employees in medium and large companies in the United States now have Internet access, compared with fifteen percent only two years ago. The availability of e-mail allows for messages to be widely and rapidly distributed, improving efficiency and reducing cost. In addition to being one of the components of the new workplace, e-mail is also the center of a hot privacy debate. Part of this is because, unlike regular mail, which is difficult to monitor, e-mail can be scanned with ease, allowing employers to engage in monitoring at an unprecedented rate, and raising the specter of a workplace free of privacy. As this relatively new technology gains ever increasing prevalence, certain questions arise, mainly, "How do we balance employee expectations of/right to privacy, with the rights of employers to observe employees to ensure quality, prevent leaks of proprietary information, and limit exposure to litigat ion?" Employers have a strong interest in monitoring the communications of their employees. Employees engaging in illegal acts, distributing proprietary information or sending sexually explicit or harassing e-mails are a serious threat and liability to the employer. However, employees should be given some measure of privacy. Privacy, along with being a human right, facilitates the free creation and distribution of ideas. If there were no private space within a company, it would most certainly have a chilling effect on the possibilities for free speech and creative thought. Employee mo...

The Difference Between Transgender and Transsexual Women

The Difference Between Transgender and Transsexual Women Transgender and transsexual are commonly confused terms that both refer to gender identity. Transgender is a broader, more inclusive category that includes all individuals who do not identify with the gender that corresponds to the sex they were assigned at birth. Transsexual is a more narrow category that includes individuals who desire to physically transition to the sex that corresponds with the gender with which they identify. (Note that the word gender is usually used to refer to social and cultural roles, while sex refers to physical attributes.) All transsexual persons are transgender. However, not all transgender persons are transsexual. Transgender women are sometimes referred to as trans women. Some may also be known as male-to-female transsexuals, MTFs, transsexual women, transgirls, or tgirls.  The term transsexual  originated as a medical term  and is  sometimes considered pejorative. It is always best to ask a person which term is preferred. Transgender vs. Transsexual   Although they both refer to gender identity, transgender and transsexual are terms with distinct meanings. That they are often used interchangeably has led to some confusion. In most cases, a transgender woman is a woman who was designated (also commonly referred to as assigned) male at birth but who identifies as a woman. Some transgender women may use the term AMAB (assigned male at birth) in describing their identity. She may take steps to transition, but these steps do not necessarily involve surgery or physical alterations. She may dress as a woman, refer to herself as a woman, or use a feminine name. (Note that some trans men may use the term AFAB, or assigned female at birth.) Not all transgender persons, however, identify with the man/woman, masculine/feminine binary. Some identify as gender nonconforming, nonbinary, genderqueer, androgynous, or third gender. For this reason, it is important never to assume that a transgender person identifies with a particular gender nor to assume what pronouns a person uses. Transitioning A transsexual woman is one who desires to physically transition to the sex that corresponds with the gender with which she identifies. Transitioning often includes taking hormones to suppress the physical characteristics of her assigned gender. Many transsexual women in the U.S. take hormone supplements, which can promote breast growth, change vocal pitch, and contribute in other ways to a more traditionally feminine appearance.  A transsexual might  even undergo gender reassignment surgery (also referred to as gender confirmation surgery or gender affirming surgery), where the anatomical features of the gender and sex assigned at birth are physically altered or removed. Strictly speaking, theres no such thing as a sex change operation. A woman can elect to have cosmetic surgeries done to alter her physical appearance to match conventional norms associated with the gender with which she identifies, but anyone can have these procedures done, regardless of their gender identity. These surgeries are not limited to transsexual people. Gender Identity vs. Sexual Orientation Gender identity is often confused with sexual orientation. The latter, however, refers only to a persons enduring emotional, romantic or sexual attraction to other people and is not related to gender identity. A transgender woman, for example, may be attracted to women, men, both, or neither and this orientation has no bearing on her gender identity. She may identify as gay or lesbian, straight, bisexual, asexual, or may not name her orientation at all. Transgender vs. Transvestite Transgender women are  often incorrectly identified as transvestites. A transvestite, however, is an individual who wears clothing primarily associated with  the gender with whom he or she does not identify. A man may prefer to dress as a woman, but this does not make him transgender if he does not identify as a woman.

Is Andrew obliged to supply a 1,500 computer to Betty, Colin and Edith Coursework

Is Andrew obliged to supply a 1,500 computer to Betty, Colin and Edith - Coursework Example Offers can be general or specific. General offers are meant for general public and anyone who can fulfill the conditions of the offer can accept it. Specific offers are made to specific parties and can be accepted only by them. An offer can be revoked at any time before it is accepted. In the given case, Andrew circulated a flyer to local businesses which means that he made a general offer to all of them. Andrew made his offer in the beginning of the month of January. His advertisement stated that â€Å"any orders notified by the end of January will be met at the special discount price of  £1,500†. Andrew found this offer to be too generous and decided to revoke it. He posted a letter of revocation to the same businesses on 20th of January. However, a revocation cannot be effective unless the offeree knows of it. In Dickenson v Dodds1, the defendant offered to sell property to the plaintiff. Before the plaintiff could reply, the defendant sold the property to a third party. A friend of the plaintiff told him that the house was sold. It was held that the offer was effectively revoked and was no longer open for acceptance because the plaintiff’s friend’s intimation was adequate notice and a reasonable person would have easily deemed the offer to have been revoked. In the given case, it is important to consider whether the acceptance was completed before the offer was revoked. Andrew communicated his revocation of offer through post on the 20th of January as against himself but the letter was not delivered before the 2nd of February. In Adams v Lindsell2, a famous rule called â€Å"Postal Rule† was established according to which the acceptance of an offer is complete when a letter of acceptance has been posted. However, this rule is not applicable on the communication of revocation of offer by post. In Stevenson, Jacques & Co v McLean3, the plaintiff was an iron merchant who purchased iron and sold it to third

Advertising and Promotion In Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words - 1

Advertising and Promotion In Business - Essay Example However, in order to attain such a position and image, effective advertising and promotion is essential. This is because; advertising means, a set of information or potential message communicated to the customers in order to improve its rankings and popularity in the market among others. By doing so, the level of awareness of the customers over the features and benefits of the products might get enhanced resulting in amplification of their reliability and consistency over the brand. For example: in classic advertising procedure, a specific problem is presented in front of the customers along with a solution to resolve the problem. This encourages the customers to purchase such type of product or services that may amplify the profitability and uniqueness of the brand or organization in the market1. Thus, advertising or marketing is recognised as a process of communicating the features and advantages of the product or services to its potential customers in order to improve the total sa le and revenue of the organization. However, in this process, the sender or the communicator presents the message to the receiver. He encodes the message and then decodes it and attains value information as presented below. By doing so, the level of relationship with the customers also gets enhanced resulting in amplification of the brand value and market share of the organization in the market among others. Due to these reasons, promotion and advertising is considered as holistic approaches of marketing. Â  

Essay --

Zach Dulac Professor Ady Media Analysis 2 December 2013 Legal Monopolies’: Go Directly to Jail, Do Not Pass Go, and Give me back my 200$ The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a secretive bill instituted by the U.S. Government in order to allow transnational corporations the control over not only our wallets, but also our health. The TPP’s intent is a proposed trade agreement, which would create the largest regional free trade agreement established in the world today. The twelve countries currently included are the U.S., Japan, Australia, Peru, Malaysia, Vietnam, New Zealand, Chile, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, and Brunei Darussalam. Together they are estimated to account for about 40% of the world’s GDP. Free trade is a system in which removes restrictive barriers such as tariffs in order to create open markets between the countries involved. The concept of free trade is appealing to most American’s considering the state of our economy over the past five years. However, the United States has been quite secretive in releasing the contents of this agreement. Shortly before a negotiation in Salt Lake City , WikiLeaks released the contents of the agreement over its website⎠¯ revealing the reason behind the secrecy. Out of twenty-nine chapters, trade is only discussed in five of them. The TPP is an agreement, in which is intended to allow transnational corporations the ability to globally control our food, our medicine, and the Internet in order to increase their companies profit maximization. International trade has always been a pivotal part of the prosperity of the United States economy over the last fifty years. Free trade is simply international trade without tariffs, quotas, or other restrictions. It builds onto the platform of our... ...at copied and sent to the patent â€Å"enforcers†. If caught doing this three times, ones Internet access would simply be cut off. The TPP is an agreement, in which is intended to allow transnational corporations the ability to globally control our food, our medicine, and the Internet in order to increase their companies profit maximization. The U.S. government is pushing to increase patents not only in the U.S., but also around the globe. These patents vastly negatively impact our food industry, our health industry, and our Internet freedom. The outrageous mislabeling of Trans-Pacific Partnership is not about trades; it’s about stacking the wallets of the wealthy for years to come, at the expense of our global society. They should have added a subtitle underneath⎠¯ The Trans-Pacific Partnership: where your human necessities are moneymaking recipes for CEO executivE’s.

Political Culture Essay

How to face difficulty appealing to voters across gender or racial lines in the 2008 Presidential elections candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. For the first time in the U.S. history, the presidential nominees is an African-American man (Barack Obama) and a woman (Hillary Clinton) has been recognized by political expert as a ground-breaking.     The defining issues of the United States presidential campaign are gender and racial identity. 1) Do gender or race issues pose challenges to Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama? Why or why not? Whether they like it or not gender and race issues will pose challenges to Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.   Since Obama is an African-American black guy and Clinton is a woman, they can ¢t help voters divide according to gender and race as much as they prevent that to happen. In terms of my personal preference this is a no contest.   But of course they have different tactics to win for the Democratic vote.   For one moment let ¢s forget about race and gender that Obama and Clinton lie outside  ¡the norms of United States politics.   Every day in business the clash between them is being played out.   Barack as new and Young Pretender.   They are both energetic and full of ideas.   We always know they are destined to do very well but we never know when, or if, they will reach that level.   They are thoroughly likeable but sometimes selfish.   Clinton the executive who has risen over the years by undramatic effort and symbolize experience.   They ¢re both ready to compromise because they know no one ever gets all they want, but they are both steady and intelligent. I think that the emphasis of this election should be on the things that Clinton and Barack represent in terms of National choices rather than on the individuals.   2) Are American voters capable of voting across gender or racial lines? Why or why not? No.   The current generation of American voters according to political experts, argue that casting votes for candidates are capable regardless of race or gender. I think the most important thing in voting is that people simply have to follow the content of their hearts.   What they think and what’s on their mind that is going to be in the best interest of the country.   Even for those who are non-partisan, the important thing is that the issue that comes across most is the need for a change in the United States.

Toxic masculinity within enron and glengarry glen ross - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1706 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/08/08 Category Business Essay Level High school Tags: Enron Essay Did you like this example? Toxic masculinity is the cultural ideal of manliness, where strength, money, and aggression are everything, while emotions, failure, and supposed feminine traits are considered weaknesses (OMalley). James Foleys Glengarry Glen Ross and Lucy Prebbles Enron deeply explore the impact that toxic masculinity has on corporate culture, and the repercussions that it causes within society. In Glengarry Glen Ross, however, the management forces toxic masculinity down the throats of the salesmen at Premiere Properties, creating detrimental competition for materialistic gain that pushes workers against each other, leading to their downfall. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Toxic masculinity within enron and glengarry glen ross" essay for you Create order In Enron, toxic masculinity breeds an unhealthy work environment and competition that seemingly brings workers together to push for more monetary gain through unlawful business practices, leading to their downfall . The toxic masculinity present within each companys culture bred unhealthy competition, creating a poor work environment, promoting unethical behavior and business practices, and eventually leading to their demise. The ideology that masculinity correlates with success is one of the largest factors that drives the business culture within each text. Within Glengarry Glen Ross, the management and Blake emphasize to the salesman that masculinity is required for success. Blakes character represents the ideal version of masculinity within the corporate culture at Premiere Properties. His materialistic success, arrogance, and high sales is the epitome of success within the lens of toxic men. Throughout the first scene, Blake berates the salesmen over their poor sales and he puts forth the notion that their livelihood and manhood depends on sales. The top sellers keep their jobs and are gifted a set of knives or even a car. The lowest sellers, however, are stripped of their job, lose their livelihood, and masculinity. In Blakes eyes, weak salesmen are not worthy of being called men, and are instead considered homosexuals. The only way to be successful within Premiere Properties is to have brass balls a nd strive to be like Blake by adopting destructive masculine ideals. The culture present within Premiere Properties idealizes success, materialistic wealth, and masculinity. This focus on masculinity and success ultimately breeds unhealthy competition within Premiere Properties, promoting unethical behavior. This is seen through the character of David Moss. Moss portrays himself as a stereotypical toxic man, someone who would seem to succeed at Premiere Properties; hes aggressive, violent, and asserts his power over those who seem weaker than him. Moss, however, underperforms sales wise and Blakes beratement exposes him for faults as a man, breaking his morale and confidence. A frustrated and broken Moss resorts to burglary in order to regain the sense of masculinity that was stripped away from him. He tries to convince George Aaronow, a perpetual failure in the eyes of Premiere Properties, to go on board with the plan, but Aaronow wants no part of it. Throughout the film, Aaronow is portrayed to be feminine through his language and mannerisms. When he sticks to his morals and decides to not chase materialistic gain, he is perceived as more feminine and therefore more a failure within the toxic masculine lens. The toxic masculinity that exists within this company culture looks down upon emotions and casts morals aside due to the thirst for material gain. This inherently promotes aggressive and unethical behavior to quench that thirst; anyone who doesnt follow that is automatically classed as feminine and seen as a failure. The idea that toxic masculinity promotes unethical behavior is also seen through the character of Shelley Levene, an old and once successful salesman. He, like Moss and Aaronow, isnt following ABC and hasnt closed a big deal in a long time. On top of the pressure of being fired, he deals with an extremely sick daughter who he needs to provide for. He attempts to empathize with Williamson to get the premium leads, but the dismissal of emotion and greed from Williamson prevents Levene from getting them. His constant failure starts to overtake his usual confident and upbeat persona, and he starts to become desperate and distressed. This desperation and stress drives Levene to the lowest depths of the moral ladder, crime. It is later revealed that it was Levene, not Moss, who stole the Glengarry leads to support his daughter. The toxic masculine work culture put forth in Premiere Properties essentially throws Levene and his problems aside, leading to Levene going down the unethical path to support his family. Not only did the masculine toxicity within the firm negatively impact the salesmen working there, it destroyed the firm from the inside as well. The management lost support from their workers, leading one to steal and sell the Glengarry leads. The firm was broken and had lost its most valuable asset. Toxic masculinity within Glengarry Glen Ross created unhealthy competition, promoted immoral behavior, and led to the demise of the firm itself. In Enron, the management essentially drives the idea that masculinity equates to success by almost solely focusing on materialistic gain, just like Premiere Properties. The management at Enron enacted a harsh, Draconian, policy that regularly cut the bottom ten percent of workers to have a company full of extremely efficient workers, leading to the most profit. This ultimately encouraged employees to adapt destructive masculine ideals to be ahead of the curve. If a worker didnt adapt to the ideals, they were most likely fired from the firm, as Claudia Roe was. Unlike in Glengarry Glen Ross where the masculine ideals drive the salesmen against the firm, the ideals bring the employees together in this story. All the Traders within the firm all share this sense of aggression, arrogance, and greed, which allows them to bond. They all encourage and berate Fastow with Trader 2, and they even go on death weekends with Skilling, where workers attempt to assert their masculinity through mascu line activities such as rolling jeeps and motorcycles and wotnot. Each workers adaptation of the toxic masculine ideals, and their pursuit to prove their masculinity to themselves and those around them essentially bonds them together. This firmwide adaptation of the destructive masculine ideals pushes everyone to focus on the managements main goal: materialistic gain through money. As stated before, the management perpetrates this agenda which then spreads down to the everyone in the firm. The masculine drive to achieve materialistic wealth heavily resonates with the heads of Enron Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, and Andy Fastow. Similar to the cases of David Moss and Shelley Leven, this drive pushed them to pursue an unethical path to achieve it. In their fit to make as much money as possible, the heads of the company decide to make money out of entirely nothing using a mark to market accounting strategy, where expected profits are treated as tangible profits. This helped them skyrocket their stock price, making the company and their personal wealth explode. Their masculine drive for success, arrogance, and greed essentially made falsifying profits seem as the right thing to do. Prebble, in a way, almost utilizes this as a way to discuss the financial sector that exists today- a male dominated field full of arrogance and deception. Not only is unethical behavior accepted by the management, but also all the Traders and the various accountants present within the firm. The highly competitive nature, the toxic masculine culture, and the managements example all make it acceptable for the employees to go on board with the deceptive and immoral practices. Almost no one questions the practices, and most even support it, since it satisfies their personal greed. This is seen throughout the entire California scene, where Enron manipulates Californias electricity market for profits. In the scene, everyone involved with the manipulation seem to have tremendous fun seeing the electricity prices and profits rise, while the state goes into chaos. They even laugh after hearing that someone was killed due to their despicable behavior. They follow exactly what Skilling tells them to do with no questions asked, and even enjoy what theyre doing. This toxic masculine culture that exists within the firm is so widespread, that it mad e unethical behavior seem acceptable. As long as it brings in profits, it is an acceptable practice to take part in. The same scene exemplifies the employees embodiment of the toxic masculine ideal of total control and dominance. Everyone at the firm seems to enjoy the suffering of the people in California, as they bring in profits, satisfying their biggest desire. A trader even exclaims lets rape this motherfucker!, referring to the electricity crisis, and everyone seems to agree and support his claim. The corporate culture of masculinity that exists within this firm seeks dominance, as they rape California. Just like in Glengarry Glen Ross, the adaptation of toxic masculine culture and ideals, and the unethical practices that took place at Enron, ultimately lead to the destruction of the firm itself. Even though the firm was as secretive and deceptive as possible, the law, media, and market caught up to them, completely destroying it. The stock price plummets to single digit dollars and the heads of Enron are arrested and convicted, despite attempting to run away at the last minute. Unlike in Glengarry Glen Ross the damage caused to society by Enron through their unethical accounting methodology was much more significant and beyond saving. More than twenty thousand employees lost their jobs, retired and current employees who were paid in stock options lost everything they worked for, and it caused many other firms to collapse. There were, however, benefits to society from this scandal in terms of new laws, policies, and government organizations in place to stop anything like Enron from ever happening again. The toxic masculinity present within Enrons and Premiere Properties ultimately led to both of their demises. Within both firms, the managements push for maximum profit, belief that masculinity correlates with success, and implementation of fierce competition promoted a toxic corporate culture and environment. Within Glengarry Glen Ross, the toxic culture and competition within the firm pushed the salesmen away from each other and the management. While in Enron, the toxic culture brought the management and employees together and allowed for them to bond on their pursuit for masculinity and fake success. The adaptation and acceptance of this culture within both firms created and promoted unethical behavior within both firms, which lead to both of the firms downfall.